Category: Bell County

Types of Criminal Cases Handled by Bell County District Courts in 2009

According to the Texas Office of Court Administration, the Bell County district courts handled a wide variety of criminal cases during the year 2009.  Here is the breakdown of cases as per the OCA:

Type of Case

Cases Pending 1/1/2009

Cases Added During 2009

Cases Disposed of During 2009

Cases Pending 12/31/2009

Capital Murder

10

11

4

17

Murder

21

16

14

23

Assault/Attempted Murder

145

244

225

164

Sexual Assault of Adult

69

62

58

73

Indecency with or Sexual Assault of a Child

82

37

62

57

Robbery

62

110

94

78

Burglary

130

300

283

147

Theft

175

183

197

161

Auto Theft

33

42

45

30

Arson

4

42

37

9

Drug Sale or Manufacture

212

450

478

184

Drug Possession

75

119

128

66

Felony DWI

57

115

112

60

Other Felonies

359

529

529

359

Misdemeanors

10

12

17

5

Totals

1,444

2,272

2,283

1,433

How Long Does It Take To Resolve a Criminal Case?

Felony Cases

According to the Texas Office of Court Administration, the Bell County district courts handled 2,283 felony criminal cases during the year 2009. Of those cases, just 10% were cases which were resolved within the first 60 days after the case was filed. Only 7% were completed between 60 and 90 days, and another 6% were completed between 90 and 120 days. The majority of all felony criminal cases, some 77% (almost 8 out of every 10 cases filed), required more than 120 days to resolve.

Statewide, there were a total of 282,897 felony criminal cases resolved in 2009. Overall, almost one out of every three felony criminal cases (or 32%) were resolved within the first 60 days after being filed. There were an additional 9% of cases which were resolved within 60 and 90 days, and another 8% from 90 to 120 days. The remaining 51% of cases took more than 120 days to complete from date of filing to final resolution.

Misdemeanor Cases

According to the Texas Office of Court Administration, the Bell County misdemeanor courts handled 9,010 cases during 2009. Of those, 15% of all misdemeanor cases were resolved within the first 30 days after being filed. However, only 6% were completed between 31 and 60 days, and another 6% between 61 and 90 days. The majority of all misdemeanor criminal cases, some 73% (roughly 8 out of every 10 cases filed), took more than 90 days to resolve.

Statewide, there were 611,694 misdemeanor cases resolved during 2009. Of those, roughly one out of every four misdemeanor criminal cases (or 23%) were resolved within the first 30 days. Next, there were an additional 11% of cases which were resolved within 31 and 60 days, and then another 9% from 61 to 90 days. The remaining 57% took more than 90 days to complete.

Bring in the judges

The 2009 Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary has been released and along with the usual interesting statistics, there is one thing that stands out to me this year.

The numbers from Bell and Lampasas Counties suggest that we need “9.5” district court judicial officers, while we supposedly only have “6.5” (here, page 46).  The explanation for this, according to the report, is that we are among the top twenty or so counties who have the highest average populations served per district court.

The most obvious question, then, is – who is our “.5” judicial officer that we already have?

The next most obvious question is – where are we going to put the three new judges?  The district courthouse is done, and the county is almost finished.  I understand that there will be a couple of extra county courtrooms available.  I don’t suppose there would be any problem with putting a district court on the “county court side” of the new courthouse. 

Or, maybe we could get two more county judges and just give them jurisdiction over all family law cases.  That would certainly free up the district courts!

Texas Veterans Courts – Why Bell County Needs One

Bell County is home to Fort Hood, the largest active duty armored post in the United States Armed Services.  As a result, Bell County has a lot of residents who are veterans.  The Texas Legislature has provided Bell County with a great opportunity to help many of our resident veterans, but Bell County has yet to do anything about it.

During the last session of the Texas Legislature, a bill was passed to allow the creation of special “veterans court programs” in this state.  The governor signed the bill into law on June 19, 2009, and it became effective September 1, 2009.  What that means is that we could have already started this program.

The veterans court program was a small part of a larger law which was designed to address the special needs of the approximately 1.7 million veterans who reside in Texas.  Specifically, the law created the “Fund for Veterans’ Assistance.”  The fund awards grants “to enhance or improve veterans’ assistance programs, including veterans’ representation and counseling, and to make grants to local communities to address veterans’ needs.”  One of the most important improvements, though, was the establishment of special pretrial veterans court programs.

Here’s how the program works:  The first step is for the county commissioners court to authorize the court.  Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 617 authorizes the commissioners court of a county to establish a veterans court program for persons arrested for or charged with any misdemeanor or felony offense.  There are no limits—it could be as simple as a drug or alcohol-related crime, or even domestic violence cases.

However, there are some limits.  A veteran is only eligible to participate in the veterans court program if: 1) the prosecutor agrees to the defendant’s participation in the program and 2) if the court in which the criminal case is pending finds that the defendant is a veteran or current member of the United States armed forces, including a member of the reserves, national guard, or state guard; and that the veteran suffers from a brain injury, mental illness, or mental disorder, including post-traumatic stress disorder, that resulted from the defendant’s military service in a combat zone or other similar hazardous duty area and materially affected the defendant’s criminal conduct at issue in the case.  Finally, the veteran ultimately retains the right to choose whether to proceed through the veterans court program or to just go through the regular criminal justice system.

Once the veteran qualifies and agrees to participate, the veteran participates in a special pretrial program.  The prosecutor and the criminal defense attorney are supposed to work together in a “non-adversarial” fashion to create an “individualized treatment plan” for the veteran. 

The individualized treatment plan lasts from a minimum of six months up to the maximum length of probation for whatever offense was charged.  The veteran can choose to withdraw from the program at any time, but then the veteran loses the benefits which would have been gained by successfully completing the pretrial intervention program. 

What are those benefits?  Well, the most important one is that any charges against the veteran would be dismissed.  That’s pretty big.  Also, the veteran is then entitled to go back and have the offense expunged from his criminal history!  That’s a huge one.

The law states that the cost to the veteran for participating in the program can be no more than $1,000; plus the cost of testing, counseling, and treatment fees in whatever amount is necessary to cover the costs of any such testing, counseling, or treatment provided under the program.

It’s also important to note that the veterans court is required by law to take steps to ensure “maximum participation of eligible defendants.”  Not only are our Bell County courts not ensuring maximum participation, they are not even ensuring any participation.  The courts can only ensure participation, though, after the county commissioners court authorizes the program.  Something our county commissioners court has yet to do!

Tarrant County is already going to be the first county to implement this type of program.  That distinction should have been ours.  If we are going to make this county a “great place” for our veterans, we need to implement this program as soon as possible.

Bell County Prosecutor Caseloads

As many of you know, each Saturday I combine the Bell County misdemeanor and felony criminal dockets into one document—sorted by defense attorney.  That way, each defense attorney can go to one place to see where and when they will be in court for that week.  That PDF document can be found by clicking the “Dockets” tab above.  Today, though, I did something different just for fun.  Instead of sorting by defense attorney, I sorted by prosecutor. 

Of course, the obvious caveat is that this is just one randomly selected week out of 52 total weeks in a year that our hard-working prosecutors are slaving away for low pay and very little appreciation. 

However, just for fun, it is interesting.  The complete document can be viewed by clicking here.  The breakdown, though, is as follows.  For this one week:

County
Prosecutor

Total
Defendants

Total
Cases

Percentage
of Total

Anne Jackson

109

141

23%

Jennine Jarolik

83

116

18%

Richard Lazott

65

95

14%

Koby Hoffpauir

52

63

11%

Mark McCarthy

45

55

10%

Mark Danford

42

49

9%

Jim Nichols

37

44

8%

Susan Sarrazin

35

53

7%

Ken Kalafut

1

2

0%

Average

52

69

 

 

District
Prosecutor

Total
Defendants

Total
Cases

Percentage
of Total

Stephanie Newell

11

12

14%

Michael Waldman

9

13

11%

Nelson Barnes

9

10

11%

Shelly Strimple

9

10

11%

Leslie McWilliams

9

9

11%

Paul McWilliams

9

9

11%

Lew Bechtol

7

8

9%

Rebecca Depew

7

7

9%

David Eakin

6

7

7%

Kara Schneible

3

4

4%

Murff Bledsoe

2

2

2%

Average

7

8

 

Seven defendants a week for assistant district attorneys versus 52 a week for assistant county attorneys?  Can anyone explain why ADAs earn so much more right off the bat?  It must be exhausting handling those 1.4 different defendants every day!  Whew!

What else is interesting?  How about the number of cases each felony prosecutor has and the corresponding offense levels?  For example, Stephanie Newell has six State Jail felonies this week, four third degrees, one second degree, and one first degree felony.  Here is the breakdown for this week:

District Prosecutor

SJF

3rd

2nd

1st

Stephanie Newell

6

4

1

1

Michael Waldman

3

2

3

5

Nelson Barnes

3

1

2

4

Shelly Strimple

5

3

2

 

Leslie McWilliams

6

3

 

 

Paul McWilliams

1

2

4

2

Lew Bechtol

2

2

2

2

Rebecca Depew

2

1

2

2

David Eakin

6

1

 

 

Kara Schneible

2

 

2

 

Murff Bledsoe

1

 

 

1

Average

3.4

2.1

2.3

2.4

And this one, which shows the percentage of pro se defendants each county attorney has to deal with this week, along with the supporting numbers:

County Prosecutor

Total Defendants

# with a
Defense
Attorney

# That Are
Pro Se

Pro Se %

Anne Jackson

109

72

37

34%

Jennine Jarolik

83

61

22

27%

Richard Lazott

65

47

18

28%

Koby Hoffpauir

52

36

16

31%

Mark McCarthy

45

28

17

38%

Mark Danford

42

32

10

24%

Jim Nichols

37

20

17

46%

Susan Sarrazin

35

23

12

34%

Ken Kalafut

1

1

0

0%

Average

52

36

17

29%

One last one is what types of cases each county prosecutor is assigned for this week. I grouped similar offenses together (for example, ABI-FM and ABI were combined as was DWI firsts and DWI seconds, etc.). The numbers represent what percentage of that prosecutors’ caseload is made up of those type of cases (for example, 38% of Anne Jackson’s cases this week are assault-type cases). Here are the rest of the numbers:

Prosecutor

Assault

Trespass

DWI

DWLI

Poss.

MTR

Theft

Anne Jackson

38%

4%

19%

4%

9%

2%

6%

Jennine Jarolik

17%

4%

28%

6%

12%

3%

5%

Richard Lazott

18%

1%

22%

9%

18%

2%

7%

Koby Hoffpauir

22%

6%

25%

3%

13%

2%

3%

Mark McCarthy

4%

2%

5%

13%

18%

 

11%

Mark Danford

20%

4%

20%

2%

14%

6%

10%

Jim Nichols

16%

7%

2%

20%

18%

 

14%

Susan Sarrazin

15%

6%

9%

15%

15%

 

13%

Average

24%

4%

21%

9%

15%

3%

9%